Multiple Choice
Billings and Durick, who are competing distributors, made an agreement whereby Billings promised that he would not sell his goods in a specified area, and Durick promised that she would not sell her goods in another specified area. The agreement was made to keep prices high by eliminating competition. This arrangement was
A) legal because it was made in reasonable restraint of trade in order to control prices and territory.
B) legal because a binding contract was made willingly by both parties.
C) illegal because it called for unreasonable restraint of trade by controlling prices and territories.
D) illegal because agreements that allow manufacturers to set prices are voidable.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Usury laws protect borrowers from paying excessively
Q2: Andrews made a $100 bet with Caruso
Q3: Any agreement that limits competition by controlling
Q4: If an agreement is partially legal and
Q6: A provision excusing one party from liability
Q7: If both parties to an illegal agreement
Q8: If an agreement contains an illegal part
Q9: If the purpose of a licensing statute
Q10: Anderson agreed to pay Dawes for acting
Q11: Maile agrees to sell his retail men's