Multiple Choice
Venardos and Aaberg agreed to enter into a partnership to farm kangaroos for their meat and pelts.Aaaberg agreed to pay Venardos $30 000 for a half share in the business.Venardos told Aaaberg that this amount mostly represented the cost of buying the kangaroos.Venardos did not tell Aaaberg that the he had not paid anything for the kangaroos, but had in fact simply saved them from being shot by a farmer who regarded them as a pest on his land and was glad to see them gone.Has Venardos breached any of his fiduciary duties to Aaaberg?
A) No.The maxim 'caveat emptor' is applicable to the transaction.
B) Yes.He should not have profited personally from his position as a partner at the expense of Aaaberg.
C) Yes.Venardos owes Aaaberg a fiduciary duty under the Australian Consumer Law.
D) No.Venardos has no duty to disclose to Aaaberg information that was gained prior to his entry into the partnership.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Which of the following best describes the
Q13: Which of the following duties is not
Q14: The authority directly and overtly given by
Q15: The silent partners in a tyre manufacturing
Q16: Which of the following is not one
Q18: What does a franchisee usually pay to
Q19: 'Joint and several liability' of partners means
Q20: X and Y buy a house together,
Q21: What restrictions in relation to franchising agreements
Q22: Which of the following would be known