Multiple Choice
Which of the following explains why two firms, Apex and Bongo, would engage in implicit collusion, rather than explicit collusion?
A) Implicit collusion allows Apex to increase its profits at the expense of Bongo without Bongo knowing that collusion has occurred; if Apex engages in explicit collusion, Bongo will realize collusion has taken place and retaliate against Apex.
B) Implicit collusion is less costly to both firms than explicit collusion; therefore, profits will be greater for both firms if they engage in implicit collusion.
C) explicit collusion is illegal; if the managers of Apex and Bongo engage in implicit collusion they may be within the law.
D) Implicit collusion always has an enforcement mechanism that forces both firms to collude; explicit collusion does not have an enforcement mechanism.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: In 2017, the Educational Testing Service (ETS)charged
Q53: A fundamental assumption in game theory is
Q84: In which of the following cartels is
Q101: Collusion makes firms better off because if
Q102: Table 14-1<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Table 14-1
Q103: Doctors and lawyers in every state need
Q204: The value of the four-firm concentration ratio
Q218: OPEC periodically meets to agree to restrict
Q245: A member of a cartel like OPEC
Q249: A large majority of the personal computers