Multiple Choice
According to the Supreme Court opinion in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, involving a search of a car obtained by consent:
I. the question of whether consent was voluntary is a question of fact to be determined by the totality of all the circumstances.
II. the government need not prove that citizens know they have a right to refuse consent.
III. probable cause is required to conduct consent searches.
IV. consent searches can only be conducted if it is inconvenient to get a warrant.
A) I, II, III, IV
B) I, II, IV
C) I, II
D) III, IV
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Who among the following can give consent
Q4: The following are all examples of emergency
Q6: Police officers at the scene of a
Q7: Identify four emergency searches, and describe why
Q11: The third question in the law of
Q22: In Illinois v.Rodriguez (1990),the police conducted the
Q26: The expectation of privacy that people have
Q45: According to the Supreme Court's decision in
Q60: If police officers have probable cause to
Q62: In Arizona v.Gant (2009),the Supreme Court ruled:<br>A)when