Multiple Choice
When evaluating the in-service programs, you determine that the second group scored 40 on both the pretest and posttest. You also discover that teachers in the first group were given home computers one month after the program began. How would you interpret the results?
A) the change in the first group demonstrates a regression to the mean
B) the in-service training might have had some effect, but there is a serious selection by history confound here
C) the in-service training program is the only factor that could have produced the effect
D) the second group obviously didn't try, so any comparison is meaningless
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: Quasi-experimental designs can include all of the
Q21: In Wood and Bootzin's (1990)study of nightmares
Q22: Wagner et al. (1988)used an interrupted times
Q23: Initial evaluations of the Head Start program
Q24: What pretest-posttest combination for the second group
Q26: To see if a flextime program improved
Q27: Surveys of existing programs, census data, and
Q28: A formative evaluation is designed to answer
Q29: What is the relationship between applied research
Q30: It is sometimes said that program evaluation