Multiple Choice
Preetpal purchased a ticket to ride on a train from Toronto to Ottawa. After she had boarded the train, she was asked if she wished to place her outerwear and backpack into a storage unit on the train. Because she did not want to be encumbered during her journey, she accepted the offer. She was given a "small baggage claims" ticket before handing over her coat and belongings. When the train arrived in Ottawa, and Preetpal tried to collect her coat, she was told that it could not be found. When she threatened to sue, the person who was representing the train told Preetpal that the back of the "small baggage claims" ticket she received excluded liability for lost or stolen goods. Regardless of any other facts, Preetpal can be bound by the exclusion clause only if
A) it was explained to her when she first bought her train ticket.
B) she actually read it.
C) was written in a font that was larger than the font that otherwise appeared on the ticket.
D) the clause was written in a language that she can read.
E) none of the above.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: A contractual term<br>A) is made with the
Q53: Even if a lease does not expressly
Q54: Someone who signs a document when in
Q55: A contract requires reasonable notice of its
Q56: A misstatement of law is identical to
Q58: Which of the following cannot result in
Q59: A pre- contractual representation<br>A) is a promissory
Q60: Consumer protection laws in several jurisdiction including
Q62: Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Q73: Personal opinions are not usually treated as