In the Case of UBS Securities Canada V

Multiple Choice

In the case of UBS Securities Canada v. Sands Brothers Canada, the court held that:

A) There was not an enforceable agreement because the agreement to sell the shares was not in writing.
B) There was not an enforceable agreement because some terms were expressly left to be decided later.
C) There was not an enforceable agreement because there was no consideration.
D) There was an enforceable agreement because all the essential terms were included.
E) There was not an enforceable agreement because the price of the shares had changed significantly after the initial offer to purchase was made