Multiple Choice
Vanderhoort contacted Prinz to buy a new furnace that burned both wood and oil. Prinz, who bought the furnace directly from the manufacturer, also installed it. The furnace was defective. It malfunctioned and caused a fire that destroyed the house of the buyer and the belongings of a visitor. Which of the following accurately sets out the legal position of the parties?
A) The visitor could sue both seller and the manufacturer.
B) Vanderhoort could sue only seller.
C) The damages to be claimed from the seller are limited to the total charged for the sale and installation.
D) If the reason for the fire was a defect caused at the factory, Vanderhoort could only sue the manufacturer for negligence.
E) If Vanderhoort successfully sued the seller, the seller could then sue the manufacturer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q117: Distinguish among a C.I.F. contract, an F.O.B.
Q118: Which one of the following statements accurately
Q119: The following events occurred before the goods
Q120: Explain the significance of a "manufacturer's warranty"
Q121: Which of the following is not a
Q123: The mission of the Consumer Protection Act
Q124: Rick has just been told that he
Q125: With respect to the breach of a
Q126: With regard to negotiable instruments, which of
Q127: With respect to a sale of goods,