Essay
Joe was a contractor and hired subtrades to help build his houses. Sam was a framer and had agreed to frame four houses for Joe for a set price. Joe was to supply the materials. After two houses were completed, Joe's suppliers increased the cost of lumber and Joe told Sam that he could no longer pay him the amount that they'd agreed. Sam agreed to take 15% less for the other two jobs, which were then completed. During this time, regular payments were made from Joe to Sam, but the total amount received was 15% lower than the originally agreed on price for the last two jobs. Sam sued Joe for the original contract price, claiming that he'd received no consideration for his agreement to take less for the last two jobs. Explain what defences may be available to Joe under these circumstances and his likelihood of success.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Joe could use promissory estoppel as his...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q14: A contract is binding if the consideration
Q15: You owe Mr. Store $900 for goods
Q16: XYZ company, a distributor of auto parts,
Q17: There is a principle that says when
Q18: The promise to make a charitable donation
Q20: In Douez v. Facebook, the Supreme Court
Q21: If an offeror makes an offer that
Q22: Why is the case of Dickinson v.
Q23: If you pay $1000 for a 90-day
Q24: Mr. Goode, a neighbour of your parents,