Multiple Choice
Sam and John drank beer and watched the Olympics for hours. When John left, he did not feel impaired, but the alcohol in his system affected his driving. He lost control of his car, which crashed through Mr. Mitsu's fence and into Mr. Mitsu's garage. Mitsu's neighbour, Mr. Watson, called the police. John was charged with driving while impaired and was found guilty in the criminal proceedings. Given these facts, which of the following is true?
A) Mr. Watson, the neighbour, could sue John for negligence.
B) Mr. Mitsu could sue John for negligence.
C) If Mr. Mitsu sued John, he would be entitled only to punitive damages.
D) Because John was charged with an offence, Mr. Mitsu cannot sue him in a civil action for compensation. One court action is all that is allowed.
E) Since no one was physically injured, there could be no civil action.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q136: Although there was no carelessness on the
Q137: What is the typical result when spouses
Q138: A surety bond provides assurance that the
Q139: _ provides only a benefit upon death,
Q140: Explain how the standard of care imposed
Q142: Joe was driving his automobile when Sam
Q143: Explain what is meant by an insurable
Q144: Some jurisdictions have instituted "no fault" insurance
Q145: A person has to prove only that
Q146: Explain what must be established in order