In R V Keegstra, the Supreme Court of Canada Stated That

Multiple Choice

In R. v. Keegstra, the Supreme Court of Canada stated that

A) although the freedom of expression is violated by the Code, these infringements are justifiable under Section 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
B) the doctrine of stare decisis no longer applies.
C) the decision of a subordinate court must always be followed, regardless of the specific facts of the case.
D) decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada ought only be applied in federal cases.
E) provincial Court judges have no authority to impose sentences in matters involving freedom of expression.