Multiple Choice
Suppose that we are in a two-factor, two-country world where the factors of production Are labor (L) and land (T) , the returns to the factors are the wage rate (w) and the rental Rate on land (t) , and the countries are country A and country B. In this situation, country A is land-abundant relative to country B by the physical definition of relative factor Abundance if __________, and country A is land-abundant relative to country B by the Price (or economic) definition if __________.
A) (L/T) A < (L/T) B; (w/t) A > (w/t) B
B) (L/T) A < (L/T) B; (w/t) A < (w/t) B
C) (L/T) A > (L/T) B; (w/t) A > (w/t) B
D) (L/T) A > (L/T) B; (w/t) A < (w/t)
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Two of the strong assumptions underlying the
Q6: Will the price definition of factor abundance
Q7: In the context of the "specific-factors model,"
Q8: In the graph in Question #24 above,
Q9: In the following diagram showing the relationship
Q11: Will the gains from trade be larger
Q12: It has been argued that the effect
Q13: Explain how relative factor abundance can determine
Q14: Which one of the following is NOT
Q15: If a commodity is classified as "labor-intensive"