Multiple Choice
A researcher interested in the effects of humor on memory randomly assigns 16 participants to either the humor group or the no-humor group.The humor group reads humorous sentences and the no-humor group reads non-humorous sentences.On a later memory test, the researcher finds that in terms of the direction of the means, the humor group had better memory than the no-humor group, but this effect was not significant (p = 0.06) .What should this researcher do?
A) She can attempt to increase her statistical power by using a two-tailed hypothesis test rather than a one-tailed hypothesis test.
B) She can abandon the study of humor on memory because given her results it is obvious that humor has no effect on memory.
C) Because the effect looks as though it is barely missing significance, she can just treat it as though the effect exists and communicate this exciting effect to her colleagues.
D) Because the effect looks as though it is barely missing significance and her sample size is fairly small, she can increase her sample size to increase her statistical power to detect the effect.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q137: Recent research published by Frumin and colleagues
Q138: Imagine that a study of memory and
Q139: Power can be thought of as the
Q140: It becomes progressively easier to declare statistical
Q141: As sample size increases, the standard error
Q142: If the expected direction of an effect
Q143: Following a meta-analysis, the researcher might decide
Q144: According to Cohen's convention, a value of
Q145: Which of the following does NOT increase
Q147: Which of these is NOT a benefit