Essay
Siebel Incorporated, a non-publicly traded company, has 2009 after-tax earnings of $20 million, which are expected to grow at 5
percent annually into the foreseeable future. The firm is debt-free, capital spending equals the firm's rate of depreciation; and the annual change in working capital is expected to be minimal. The firm's beta is estimated to be 2.0, the 10-year Treasury bond is 5 percent, and the historical risk premium of stocks over the risk-free rate is 5.5 percent. Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's, was sold recently at a purchase price of 11 times its 2009 after-tax earnings, which included a 20 percent premium over its current market price. Aware of the premium paid for the purchase of Rand, Siebel's equity owners would like to determine what it might be worth if they were to attempt to sell the firm in the near future. They chose to value the firm using the discounted cash flow and comparable recent transactions methods. They believe that either method provides an equally valid. Estimate of the firm's value.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Answers:
a. $228.8 million
b. ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
a. $228.8 million
b. ...
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q68: What are real options and how are
Q69: The major advantage of the value driver
Q70: In determining the liquidation value of inventories,
Q71: Conceptually, firms with P/E ratios less than
Q72: Which of the following is not generally
Q74: Delhi Automotive Inc. is the leading supplier
Q75: Bristol-Myers Squibb Places a Big Bet on
Q76: Which one of the following is not
Q77: Based on the information given in the
Q78: Relative valuation methods are often described as