Multiple Choice
Posner, Snyder, and Davidson (1980) examined spatial attention using arrows as a prime. Most of the time the arrow pointed to the area where the stimulus would appear, but 20% of the time it did not. They compared reaction times (RTs) when the cue was valid, when it was invalid, and when a neutral cue was presented. Which of the following statements was NOT supported by their findings?
A) RTs were slower in the invalid condition than in the valid condition.
B) Spatial attention is limited in capacity.
C) We can attend to two different locations without a reduction in performance.
D) RTs were faster for responses to valid cues relative to neutral cues.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Stroop interference demonstrates that<br>A)word reading is automatized.<br>B)the
Q33: Participants are instructed to fixate on a
Q34: Explain how top-down and bottom-up processing contribute
Q35: Lucas suffered a blow to his right
Q36: Change blindness demonstrates that<br>A) perception leads to
Q38: A participant who has just participated in
Q39: Studies looking at electrical activity in the
Q40: Recordings from neurons in area V4 of
Q48: Compare and contrast inattentional blindness and change
Q57: Describe the Posner and Snyder (1975)experiment.What does