Essay
Suppose you are going to invest equal amounts in three stocks. The annual return from each stock is normally distributed with a mean of 0.01 (1%) and a standard deviation of 0.06. The annual return on your portfolio, the output variable of interest, is the average of the three stock returns. Run @RISK, using 1000 iterations, on each of the scenarios described in the questions below, and report few results from the summary report sheets.
-(A) The three stock returns are highly correlated. The correlation between each pair is 0.9
(B) The three stock returns are practically independent. The correlation between each pair is 0.1
(C) The first two stocks are moderately correlated. The correlation between their returns is 0.4. The third stock's return is negatively correlated with the other two. The correlation between its return and each of the first two is -0.8.
(D) Compare the portfolio distributions from @RISK for the three scenarios in (A), (B) and (C). What do you conclude?
(E) You might think of a fourth scenario, where the correlation between each pair of returns is a large negative number such as -0.80. But explain intuitively why this makes no sense. Try running a simulation with these negative correlations to see what happens.
Correct Answer:

Verified
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D) The mean portfolio re...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: Correlation between two random input variables might
Q11: The normal distribution is often used in
Q25: One of the primary advantages of simulation
Q26: The "random" numbers generated by the RAND
Q30: If you add several normally distributed random
Q62: A company is about to develop and
Q63: (A) What are the appropriate probability distributions
Q69: Which of the following statements are false
Q70: A company is about to develop and
Q72: Each different set of values obtained for