Multiple Choice
Given the following syllogism:
No tigers are bears.
This syllogism commits the existential fallacy from:
A) The Aristotelian standpoint but not from the Boolean standpoint.
B) Both the Boolean and the Aristotelian standpoints.
C) The Boolean standpoint but not from the Aristotelian standpoint.
D) Neither the Boolean nor the Aristotelian standpoint.
E) The syllogistic standpoint.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Syllogistic Form 4A<br>Given the following syllogistic form:
Q347: Syllogism 2I<br>Given the following syllogism:<br>Some factually incorrect
Q348: Given the following enthymeme: Only dentists are
Q349: Given the following enthymeme: Suzanne must be
Q350: Syllogism 4D<br>Given the following syllogism:<br>A few Hondas
Q351: Given the following enthymeme: Peaches are not
Q352: Syllogistic Form 2G<br>Given the following syllogistic form:<br>No
Q353: Syllogistic Form 1F<br>Given the following syllogistic form:<br>No
Q356: Syllogistic Form 6I<br>Given the following syllogistic form:<br><img
Q357: Syllogism 2D<br>Given the following syllogism:<br>Some low class