Essay
A movie critic wanted to determine whether or not moviegoers of different age groups evaluated a movie differently. With this objective, he commissioned a survey that asked people their ratings of their most recently watched movies. The rating categories were:
1 = terrible.
2 = fair.
3 = good.
4 = excellent.
Each respondent was also asked to categorise his or her age as either:
1 = teenager.
2 = young adult (20-34).
3 = middle age (35-50).
4 = senior (over 50).
The results are shown below.
Do these data provide sufficient evidence to infer at the 5% significance level that there were differences in ratings among the different age categories?
Correct Answer:

Verified
The locations of all three po...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q70: The restaurant critic on a newspaper
Q71: A non-parametric method to compare two populations,
Q72: A movie critic wanted to determine
Q73: Each year the personnel department in
Q74: Given the following statistics from a
Q76: The Wilcoxon rank sum test (like most
Q77: The Friedman test is the non-parametric counterpart
Q78: The marketing manager of a pizza
Q79: In a Wilcoxon rank sum test for
Q80: In a Friedman test for comparing four