Multiple Choice
Is it ever possible to conclude that two things are causally related without committing the post hoc fallacy?
A) No, because conclusions about causality are always false.
B) No, because causal conclusions can only be deduced from the order of events.
C) Yes, as long as the conclusion isn't based solely on the order of events.
D) Yes, as long as the conclusion is based solely on the order of events.
E) Yes, as long as we don't try to conclude which is the cause and which is the effect.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Which factors are most important in determining
Q4: Which fallacy is committed by the following
Q5: When there is a positive claim (X
Q6: Which fallacy is committed by the following
Q7: Which of the following arguments commits the
Q9: Accident and division:<br>A)are two different names for
Q10: The post hoc fallacy occurs when someone:<br>A)assumes
Q11: Which of the following arguments commits the
Q12: Which fallacy is committed by the following
Q13: The fallacy of equivocation occurs when someone:<br>A)uses