Solved

Is This Syllogism Valid

Question 178

Multiple Choice

Is this syllogism valid? Is this syllogism valid? A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion. B) No, because the premises make a broader claim than the conclusion. C) No, because the premises make a narrower claim than the conclusion. D) Yes. E) There is not enough information to determine the answer. Is this syllogism valid? A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion. B) No, because the premises make a broader claim than the conclusion. C) No, because the premises make a narrower claim than the conclusion. D) Yes. E) There is not enough information to determine the answer.


A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion.
B) No, because the premises make a broader claim than the conclusion.
C) No, because the premises make a narrower claim than the conclusion.
D) Yes.
E) There is not enough information to determine the answer.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q173: For the next group of questions, consider

Q174: What is the form of the following

Q175: Is it possible that an enthymeme could

Q176: The figure of a categorical syllogism consists

Q177: If we are solving an enthymeme and

Q179: In the Venn diagram of a categorical

Q180: For the next group of questions, consider

Q181: Can two of the three terms in

Q182: For the next group of questions, consider

Q183: Could an enthymeme be missing both premises?<br>A)No,