Multiple Choice
The following Venn diagrams were constructed using the traditional view of existential import.Is the syllogism valid?
A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion.
B) No, because the conclusion makes the claim that something exists in the overlap between the S and P circles, but the premises only suggest that it might.
C) No, because there are two Xs in the premises, but only one in the conclusion.
D) Yes.
E) There is not enough information to determine the answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q193: Is the following syllogism valid? No Internet
Q194: The figure of a categorical syllogism is
Q195: Can the rules of validity be applied
Q196: For the next group of questions, consider
Q197: Using the modern rules of validity,
Q199: What is the unstated conclusion in the
Q200: What is the unstated premise in the
Q201: What two propositions are represented by the
Q202: If we are solving an enthymeme and
Q203: A term is distributed in a proposition