Multiple Choice
The following Venn diagrams were constructed using the traditional view of existential import.Is the syllogism valid?
A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion.
B) No, because there are more Xs in the premises than in the conclusion.
C) No, because the premises clearly show that some of the Ss cannot be Ps, but the conclusion shows that all Ss are Ps.
D) Yes.
E) There is not enough information to determine the answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q183: Could an enthymeme be missing both premises?<br>A)No,
Q184: The middle term is always the:<br>A)predicate of
Q185: What is the form of the following
Q186: For the next group of questions, consider
Q187: For the next group of questions, consider
Q189: How many possible forms are there for
Q190: If the minor premise of a valid
Q191: Which of the following is the correct
Q192: The predicate term is distributed in propositions
Q193: Is the following syllogism valid? No Internet