Suppose That We Open a Randomly Chosen Book and Examine

Multiple Choice

Suppose that we open a randomly chosen book and examine its first and last sentences.We label the first sentence as p and use it as the premise of a syllogism.And we label the last sentence as q and use it as the conclusion of that same syllogism.Is it always possible to create a valid syllogism by adding "If p, then q" as a second premise?

A) Yes, but the hypothetical premise might strain credibility.
B) Yes, but only because they come from the same book.
C) No, because p and q might be completely unrelated.
D) No, because the resulting syllogism would be invalid.
E) No, because if that worked, you could use any proposition to argue for any other proposition.