Multiple Choice
Is it possible to give an explanation for something that hasn't happened yet?
A) No, since explanations are always given after the fact.
B) No, since future events are always unknown, so we can argue for them, but not explain them.
C) No, since explanation requires us to work backward, not forward.
D) Yes, since we could try to convince someone that a future event will happen.
E) Yes, since some facts about the future are known in advance.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: In which of the following explanations is
Q14: The proposition that an explanation seeks to
Q15: Which of the following is most clearly
Q16: What part of the following explanation is
Q17: Which of the following explanations has the
Q19: The primary goal of an argument is
Q20: The proposition that an explanation uses to
Q21: An explanation has logical strength when:<br>A)the hypothesis
Q22: If a hypothesis is implausible, then we
Q23: Which of the following explanations is the