Multiple Choice
Suppose the government limits the amount of pollution from cars by capping the amount of pollution they can emit to 30 pounds of carbon dioxide per car per year. If Alex was willing to pay $50 to emit an extra pound of carbon dioxide and Tyler was willing to sell a pound of his allowance for $30, would it be efficient for them to make this trade?
A) No, it would raise the cost of pollution abatement.
B) Yes, it would lower the cost of pollution abatement.
C) It is impossible to say whether this would or would not be an efficient trade.
D) There is no incentive for Alex and Tyler to trade.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q65: Markets are always able to find solutions
Q66: The Clean Air Act:<br>A) banned the emission
Q67: Conditions for the Coase theorem are typically
Q68: The market equilibrium is not efficient when
Q69: Which equation is TRUE?<br>A) private cost +
Q71: If the government forced external cost internalization
Q72: External costs lead markets to produce a
Q73: What negative externality does antibiotic use create?<br>A)
Q74: The text discusses private solutions for resolving
Q75: If a tin of sardines creates a