In the 1945 Alcoa Antitrust Case, the Court Found ALCOA

Multiple Choice

In the 1945 Alcoa antitrust case, the Court found ALCOA:

A) not guilty of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act because it was a good monopoly.
B) did not have a good reason for having a large market share, so found it guilty.
C) guilty because its firm size was a per se violation of antitrust laws.
D) not guilty because it did not engage in any illegal or unfair acts.
E) was no threat to industrial democracy.