Essay
Both Sally and Ed own property with a fair market value less than the amount of the outstanding mortgage on the property and also less than the original cost basis.Each of them was able to convince the mortgage holder to reduce the principal amount on the mortgage.Sally's mortgage is on her personal residence and Ed's mortgage is on rental property he owns.Both debts are recourse.
a.Each taxpayer's liabilities were reduced.Therefore, the net worth of each has increased as measured using the cost basis in the assets.Each taxpayer also
experienced a loss in the value of her or his assets.However, the losses were not realized (because each taxpayer still owns the property).Thus, each taxpayer had income from the reduction in debt but no recognized loss.Fortunately, the tax law in effect through 2017 allows the taxpayer whose property is a personal residence to exclude the income from debt discharge from gross income.The taxpayer who
a.Explain whether each of these individuals has realized income from the reduction in the debt.
b.Assume that under the current system of measuring income, each of these taxpayers realized
income from the reductions in the mortgages.Should either of these taxpayers be permitted
to exclude any of the debt discharge income?
Correct Answer:

Verified
owns the rental home is not eligible for...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q5: Amber Machinery Company purchased a building from
Q6: Ben was hospitalized for back problems.While he
Q7: The exclusion of interest on educational savings
Q8: Beverly died during the current year.At the
Q9: James, a cash basis taxpayer, received
Q11: Jack received a court award in a
Q12: The employees of Mauve Accounting Services are
Q13: The taxpayer was in the 35% marginal
Q14: Heather's interest and gains on investments
Q15: The Royal Motor Company manufactures automobiles.Nonmanagement employees