Essay
A trusted employee of Outback Tours was caught in the act of embezzling funds. He confessed to earlier embezzlements but retracted the confession on the advice of his attorney. Over the course of the most recent quarter it has been determined that $20000 was embezzled.
Outback Tours has suffered adverse publicity in the recent past because of serious injury to five tourists that occurred during a two week "Winter Wilds Adventure" tour. The company has therefore decided to avoid publicity and has agreed to drop all charges against the embezzling employee. In return the employee has agreed to a notation of "Terminated-Not to be Rehired" to be appended to his personnel file.
Required:
1. Who are the stakeholders in the decision not to prosecute?
2. Was it ethical for the company to decide not to prosecute? Explain.
Correct Answer:

Verified
1. The stakeholders include
The embezzli...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q2: A company has an average inventory on
Q3: A technique for evaluating financial statements that
Q4: Pro forma income usually excludes items that
Q5: Another name for trend analysis is horizontal
Q6: The following information pertains to Rural
Q8: Selected information from the comparative financial
Q9: Stellar Inc. decided on January 1 to
Q10: Ale Corporation had net income of $240000
Q11: The ratio that uses weighted average common
Q12: A measure of the percentage of each