Essay
Referring back to question 10, how did the outcomes of precision, range, and rank-ordered matching differ?
The three matching procedures differed in how well they controlled group weight: precision matching (mean difference = 0), range matching (mean difference = 1 pound), and rank-ordered matching (mean difference = 3.5 pounds).They also differed in the number of pairs formed: precision matching (3), range matching (7), and rank-ordered matching (8).
What are the pros and cons of using each procedure?
Precision matching provides the best control over an extraneous subject variable since group scores are identical (pro), but discards the most data (con).
Range matching allows an experimenter to balance control over an extraneous subject variable against the number of scores discarded (pro), but usually discards more scores than rank-ordered matching (con).
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Introduction The design of an experiment is
Q2: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects What information does
Q4: Two Independent Groups We use a control
Q5: Introduction Researchers always assign subjects to only
Q6: Two Matched Groups Which matching procedure sometimes
Q7: Two Matched Groups In Jason's study of
Q8: Two Independent Groups<br>Homer randomly assigned subjects to
Q9: Two Independent Groups All of these statements
Q10: Two Independent Groups Random selection of subjects
Q11: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects When there is