Multiple Choice
Scenario 20-3
Suppose that a society is made up of five families whose incomes are as follows:
$120,000; $90,000; $30,000; $30,000; and $18,000.
The federal government is considering two potential income tax plans:
Plan A is a negative income tax plan where the taxes owed equal 1/3 of income minus $20,000.
Plan B is a two-tiered plan where families earning less than $35,000 pay no income tax and families earning more than $35,000 pay 10% of their income in taxes. The income tax revenue collected from those families earning over $35,000 is then redistributed equally to those families earning less than $35,000.
-Refer to Scenario 20-3. Assuming that utility is directly proportional to the cash value of after-tax income, which government policy would an advocate of utilitarianism prefer?
A) Plan A
B) Plan B
C) either Plan A or Plan B
D) neither Plan A nor Plan B because any plan that forcibly redistributes income is against the philosophy
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q100: When the government enacts policies to make
Q431: Suppose that a family saves and borrows
Q432: The utilitarian case for redistributing income is
Q433: Scenario 20-4<br>Suppose the government implemented a negative
Q434: Scenario 20-6<br>Zooey is a single mother of
Q437: The distribution of income for Dismal is
Q438: Table 20-14<br>James, Luke, Peter, Micah, and Sarah
Q439: The poverty rate is based on a
Q440: If society chose to maximize total utility
Q441: The study by economists Cox and Alm