Matching
Match the following cases with their main features.
Premises:
Osborne v. Ohio
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
New Yorkv. Ferber
U.S. v. Williams
Central Hudson Gas and Electric v.Public Service Commission of New York
Responses:
making virtual pornography legal
ruling that PROTECT does not prohibit a substantial amount of protected speech
placing of child pornography outside the umbrella of free speech guaranteed by the Constitution
establishing a standard of scienter that had been lacking in the previous ruling
evaluating the application of the First Amendment to commercial speech
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
Osborne v. Ohio
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
New Yorkv. Ferber
U.S. v. Williams
Central Hudson Gas and Electric v.Public Service Commission of New York
Premises:
Osborne v. Ohio
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
New Yorkv. Ferber
U.S. v. Williams
Central Hudson Gas and Electric v.Public Service Commission of New York
Responses:
Related Questions
Q42: Prior to the 1950s, traditional notions of
Q43: The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996
Q44: The Child Pornography Prevention Act was designed
Q45: Which of the following ruled that PROTECT
Q46: The Court held in Sable Communications, Inc.v.FCC
Q48: Summarize various technology specific legislations regarding child
Q49: Which of the following was enacted to
Q50: In order to tighten prohibitions of child
Q51: In Osborne v.Ohio, the Court upheld the
Q52: The Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation