Multiple Choice
Mid-American Oil had a contract with NSB Company to supply 1,000 gallons of oil by September 1.The contract contained a provision which required all modifications to be written and signed by the company presidents.In early August,an executive of Mid-American talked with the purchasing agent of NSB who orally agreed to two shipments of oil;one in September and the second one in December.By September 30,when only 500 gallons had been delivered,NSB sued.The likely outcome of this lawsuit is:
A) NSB wins because the modification was not supported by new consideration.
B) NSB wins because the modification has to be in writing.
C) Mid-American Oil wins because the UCC governs this case and no new consideration is required.
D) Mid-American Oil wins because new consideration was present.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Pastor Tom was employed by the First
Q5: In the historic case of Hamer v.Sidway,the
Q10: Contracts in which one party agrees in
Q13: An agreement to settle a debt for
Q15: A promise by Derkin Restaurants to buy
Q21: Under the Uniform Commercial Code,an agreement modifying
Q22: Hilda owes Lex $3,000,which is an undisputed
Q27: An unliquidated debt can be described as<br>A)a
Q36: What phrase explains how a requirements contract
Q43: If someone provides a service that he