Multiple Choice
You have been asked to evaluate the effectiveness of a new anti-smoking campaign in a local high school. You are able to collect pretest information on smoking rates before the campaign begins. You know that the entire school will be required to participate in the campaign and so random assignment is impossible.You are also aware that a reduction in smoking after the campaign could be caused by any number of other confounding variables.What can you do in this situation to enhance your ability to determine if the campaign was effective in reducing smoking?
A) test the students at the end of the campaign and then again a year later - if reductions in smoking remain at that time then you can be confident that the campaign was effective
B) conduct extensive postexperimental interviews to determine the cause of any change in smoking rates
C) identify a similar school that is not using the campaign and include them in a nonequivalent comparison group design
D) interview parents of the students
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: Of the major extraneous variables discussed in
Q30: In using an interrupted time-series design, how
Q31: Which of the following threats to internal
Q32: One "additive/interaction threat" to the nonequivalent comparison-group
Q33: When using a quasi-experimental design, rival hypotheses
Q35: In an attempt to reduce the use
Q36: The National Science Foundation has a policy
Q37: One essential characteristic of quasi-experimental designs that
Q38: The internal validity threat known as "history"
Q39: Dr. Hunter is concerned about pre-test differences