Essay
Suppose that two experiments were conducted to compare the effects of two new insect repellants. In Experiment X, a simple random sample was taken from the population of River City, and the citizens were randomly assigned to repellant A and repellant B. In Experiment Y, a stratified random sample was taken from the population of River City, and the citizens were randomly assigned to repellant A and repellant B. (River City has 4 geographic areas of town, the NE, NW, SE, and SW quadrants; 100 people from each quadrant were sampled for Experiment B.) The results of the experiments were the same: fewer insects landed on the arms that had been treated with insect repellant A. (a) For each experiment, X and Y, discuss whether one can legitimately infer from each of these experiments that repellant A is better than B? Why or why not? (b) For each experiment, X and Y, discuss whether one can legitimately generalize to the population of River City from each of these experiments? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:

Verified
a) In each of these experiments we can i...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: In evaluating an experiment, how would you
Q7: Response bias can occur when responses are
Q8: A friend of yours, who is not
Q9: The method of control wherein an extraneous
Q10: Increasing sample size will generally eliminate bias
Q12: A treatment is any particular combination of
Q13: As long as the sample size is
Q14: Blocking is a technique that can be
Q15: Two factors are extraneous if their effects
Q16: A control group provides a baseline for