True/False
Low power (40X to 60X) microscopic analysis is much more useful in determining stone tool microwear than high power microscopy (up to 400X).
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q6: Inferring that prehistoric kivas had the same
Q7: Obsidian blades are much sharper than steel
Q8: To create relevant bridging arguments, archaeologists must<br>A)
Q9: Microwear traces on stone tools can be
Q10: Archaeologists have tried to replicate, through trial
Q12: Which of the following is true of
Q13: Don Crabtree's experimental flintknapping research:<br>A) failed to
Q14: When discussing projectile points, a "flute" refers
Q15: The purpose of middle range theory is
Q16: The principle asserting that the processes now