In the Alcoa Case of 1945, the Courts Held That

Multiple Choice

In the Alcoa case of 1945, the courts held that

A) the mere possession of monopoly power is a violation of the antitrust laws.
B) only contracts and combinations that unreasonably restrain trade are in violation of the Sherman Act.
C) retail and wholesale firms are exempt from antitrust legislation.
D) firms that sell more than one-half of their output overseas are exempt from antitrust.