In the US Steel Case, the Court Ruled That

Multiple Choice

In the U.S. Steel case, the court ruled that

A) even though a firm's behavior might be legal, the mere possession of monopoly power was in violation of the Sherman Act.
B) only monopolies that unreasonably restrain trade are subject to antitrust action under the Sherman Act.
C) when made by dominant firms, tying contracts are illegal, per se.
D) the company violated the Clayton Act and therefore should be dissolved into several competing firms.