Short Answer
Identify any fallacies in the following passage either by naming them or, where they seem not to conform to any of the patterns described in the text, by giving a brief explanation of why the fallacious reasoning is irrelevant to the point at issue.
When he was twelve, Walter Polovchak and his family were permitted to emigrate from the Soviet Union to the United States. Walter's father, however, eventually decided to return to Russia and was pressured by the Soviet Embassy to take Walter with him. The American Civil Liberties Union sided with Walter's father, rather than with Walter, who wished to remain in Chicago. When the case reached the courts, the legal arguments of the ACLU were criticized by some editorial writers on the grounds that in most other instances involving the rights of children, the ACLU had always sided with the child. Commented one law professor: "The ACLU's actions regarding Walter can be understood only in terms of 'an unwillingness to criticize communism.'"
Correct Answer:

Verified
Ad hominem...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q123: Identify any fallacies in the following passage.<br>"Don't
Q124: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q125: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q126: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q127: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q129: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q130: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q131: Identify any fallacies in the following passage
Q132: Identify any fallacies in the following passage.<br>"One
Q133: Identify any fallacies in the following passage