Solved

As Part of a Study at a Large University, Data x1=x _ { 1 } =

Question 104

Short Answer

As part of a study at a large university, data were collected on n = 224 freshmen computer science (CS) majors in a particular year. The researchers were interested in modeling y, a student's grade point average (GPA) after three semesters, as a function of the following independent variables (recorded at the time the students enrolled in the university): x1=x _ { 1 } = average high school grade in mathematics (HSM)
x2=x _ { 2 } = average high school grade in science (HSS)
x3=x _ { 3 } = average high school grade in English (HSE)
x4=x _ { 4 } = SAT mathematics score (SATM)
x5=x _ { 5 } = SAT verbal score (SATV)
A first-order model was fit to data with the following results:
 SOURCE  DF  SS  MS  FVALUE  PROB > F  MODEL 528.645.7311.69.0001 ERROR 218106.820.49 TOTAL 223135.46\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\hline \text { SOURCE } & \text { DF } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { FVALUE } & \text { PROB }>\text { F } \\\text { MODEL } & 5 & 28.64 & 5.73 & 11.69 & .0001 \\\text { ERROR } & 218 & 106.82 & 0.49 & & \\\text { TOTAL } & 223 & 135.46 & & &\end{array}

 ROOT MSE 0.700 R-SOUARE 0.211\begin{array}{llll}\text { ROOT MSE } & 0.700 & \text { R-SOUARE } & 0.211\end{array}
 DEP MEAN 4.635 ADJ R-5Q 0.193\begin{array}{llll}\text { DEP MEAN } & 4.635 & \text { ADJ R-5Q } & 0.193\end{array}

 PARAMETER STANDARD  T FOR O:  VARIABLE  ESTIMATE  ERROR  PARAMETER =0 PROB >T INTERCEPT 2.3270.0395.8170.0001 X1 (HSM) 0.1460.0373.7180.0003 X2 (HSS) 0.0360.0380.9500.3432 X3 (HSE) 0.0550.0401.3970.1637 X4 (SATM) 0.000940.000681.3760.1702 X5 (SATV) 0.000410.000590.6890.4915\begin{array}{lrrrr}&\text { PARAMETER }&\text {STANDARD } & \text { T FOR O: }\\ \text { VARIABLE } & \text { ESTIMATE } & \text { ERROR } & \text { PARAMETER }=0 & \text { PROB }>|T|\\\text { INTERCEPT } & 2.327 & 0.039 & 5.817 & 0.0001 \\\text { X1 (HSM) } & 0.146 & 0.037 & 3.718 & 0.0003 \\\text { X2 (HSS) } & 0.036 & 0.038 & 0.950 & 0.3432 \\\text { X3 (HSE) } & 0.055 & 0.040 & 1.397 & 0.1637 \\\text { X4 (SATM) } & 0.00094 & 0.00068 & 1.376 & 0.1702 \\\text { X5 (SATV) } & -0.00041 & 0.00059 & -0.689 & 0.4915 \\\hline\end{array}

Interpret the value under the column heading PROB>F\mathrm { PROB } > \mathrm { F } .
A) There is sufficient evidence (at α=.01\alpha = .01 ) to conclude that the first-order model is statistically useful for predicting GPA.
B) There is insufficient evidence (at α=.01\alpha = .01 ) to conclude that the first-order model is statistically useful for predicting GPA.
C) Over 99%99 \% of the variation in GPAs can be explained by the model.
D) Accept H0H _ { 0 } (at α=.01\alpha = .01 ); at least one of the β\beta -coefficients in the first-order model is equal to 0 .

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions