Essay
Al was an attorney in a small town and was very well-respected. A couple retained Al to represent them on the purchase of a home. Before closing, Al informed the couple of payments that they were required to make by check at the closing. Among the required payments the attorney told the couple to make were a check for $500 to Bob Brown and a check for $610 to Susan Lee. The attorney explained that the check to Brown was for a survey of the property and the check to Lee was for termite control work that the couple had authorized.
The checks were issued and taken by Al who promised to deliver them. Al did not, however, deliver them. Instead, Al forged the endorsements of the respective payees and cashed the checks. When Al was later arrested on a similar matter, the couple learned what had happened.
The couple made a claim against its bank for reimbursement, claiming the bank was not authorized to pay these checks because they had not been effectively negotiated to the bank. When the facts came to light, no person named Bob Brown had done a survey on the property, but the termite work had been done by Lee. Decide both cases.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The couple will not recover on the check...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q12: In the case of a check, when
Q15: An endorsement "Pay to Donald Hames, Cathy
Q16: When a negotiable instrument is transferred by
Q18: It is worse for the holder to
Q19: A special endorsement consists of the signature
Q21: The situation in which an individual impersonates
Q33: When a negotiable instrument is negotiated by
Q37: A blank indorsement turns a(n) _instrument into
Q49: If a lost negotiable instrument is in
Q51: When the indorser merely signs a negotiable