Essay
Suzy Bartles enters into an oral contract to purchase a tract of land from Bill Hermes. The land is considered worthless, but Bartles feels that she has discovered a possible usage that would drastically increase the value of the land. To assure herself of the potential value of the land, Bartles orally hires an attorney to investigate the title and records associated with the land in question. Before gaining any information from her attorney, Bartles orally contracts with a builder to construct a huge building on the site. Because of the size of the project, a completion time is difficult to predict. Bartles now discovers that the land is indeed useless, a fact that she obtains through information from her attorney.
Bartles now refuses to honor her contracts with Hermes, her attorney, and the builder. Must Bartles honor her contractual agreements?
Correct Answer:

Verified
All contracts concerning the sale of lan...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q24: Bart was a self-made millionaire who had
Q30: When the statute of frauds applies and
Q38: A person who is prevented from enforcing
Q40: The writing required by the statute of
Q43: When an insurance policy is ambiguous, the
Q48: An oral agreement to supply a line
Q49: A writing required by the statute of
Q53: A contract is interpreted to give effect
Q54: Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:<br>A)
Q56: The parol evidence rule prohibits only the