Essay
Jones and Clark entered into a written contract for the purchase of an apartment building by Clark. The contract was carefully drafted to set forth the agreement of the parties. It was signed by both parties. Clark subsequently claimed that the contract did not cover all the terms included in the written and oral agreements that the parties had made during their prior negotiations.?Jones claimed that the parol evidence rule barred proof of all of their prior agreements. Which claim would be upheld in court?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Judgment would be for Jones. The parol e...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q50: The parol evidence rule does not apply
Q51: An oral contract containing a promise by
Q52: A court can imply details of a
Q53: A father's handshake and oral promise to
Q54: Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:<br>A)
Q55: Under the majority view, a contract that
Q56: Parol evidence is not admissible to show
Q57: Through incorporation by deference, a contract can
Q58: When persons enter into an agreement, it
Q59: Under the statute of frauds, an oral