Essay
John was driving his car in a careless way, failing to drive as a reasonably prudent person would under the driving conditions. Ramona was crossing the street in a careless way, failing to cross as a reasonably prudent person would. John struck and injured Ramona with the car John was driving. At trial, it was determined that John was 80 percent at fault and that Ramona was 20 percent at fault. The injuries sustained amounted to $100,000. Explain how much, if any, recovery Ramona would receive in a state that applies the contributory negligence rule. Do the same thing for a state that applies the comparative negligence rule.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In numerous states, former employers are protected
Q3: The tort of invasion of privacy includes
Q4: Negligence is imposed because the activity involved
Q5: Commercial exploitation, also called right of publicity,
Q6: Causing someone's character to be questioned is
Q7: A local newspaper devotes its New Year's
Q8: Bruce opens a used car lot but
Q9: Professionals have a duty to perform their
Q10: A wrong that arises from a violation
Q11: The tort of false imprisonment requires the