Multiple Choice
CASE 3.1,Wal-Mart Stores,Inc.v.Dukes (2011) ,involved a question of whether:
A) Wal-Mart should be properly sued in federal vs.state court.
B) there was sufficient commonality among Wal-Mart employees to certify the group as a class.
C) one Wal-Mart employee could represent over one million other employees.
D) the employees had waived their rights to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: In 2002 the European Union adopted the
Q13: In cases involving transactions via the internet,the
Q15: Fact Pattern 3-2<br>Sally tells you that she
Q18: The silicone breast implant case against Dow
Q19: Court opinions are published in collections of
Q20: Fact Pattern 3-2<br>Sally tells you that she
Q21: A court has _ when it has
Q43: Under what circumstances should a judge grant
Q52: _ which notifies the _ of the
Q53: The case discussed in the text,Upjohn Co.v.United