Multiple Choice
Fact Pattern 7-1
Prudence offered to sell her car to Danny for $3,000. Danny was not sure what to do, so he asked Prudence if she would hold the offer open for him for one week for $50. Prudence said sure, and the parties signed a contract to the effect that Prudence would hold the car. A few hours later, Bobby unexpectedly offered Prudence $3,500 for the car, and Prudence sold it to him on the spot. Danny decided to buy the car, but when he came by to pick it up the next day, it was gone. Prudence gave Danny his $50 back telling him that was her only obligation and that if he had any complaints, he could take it up with Bobby. Danny found a similar car the next week for $3,500 and purchased it.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 7-1.What damages,if any,could Danny likely collect against Prudence in litigation over the car?
A) None
B) Reliance damages consisting of $500
C) Incidental damages consisting of $50
D) Compensatory damages consisting of $500
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: In a unilateral contract,a promise is given
Q12: A contract entered into by a minor
Q16: An illegal contract is generally considered a
Q24: Under the doctrine of _,a court may
Q30: Which of the following are damages that
Q31: An objective standard is used in determining
Q33: Which of the following is true regarding
Q34: Commercial transactions involving the sale of goods,movable
Q34: _ damages compensate a party for losses
Q36: In CASE 7.2,Kurashige v.Indian Dunes,Inc.(1988),plaintiff Kurashige used