Multiple Choice
In CASE 8.2 MacNeil Automotive Products,Ltd.v.Cannon Automotive,Ltd.(2010) ,MacNeil subcontracted with Canon Automotive to provide floor mats on automobiles.MacNeil claimed the mats were defective and breached the express warranty.The main question before the court was whether:
A) the sales talk constituted an implied warranty for fitness of purpose.
B) the sales talk constituted an implied warranty of merchantability.
C) the sales talk was puffery or an express warranty.
D) the sales talk properly disclaimed all express warranties.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Most courts require that a plaintiff prove
Q5: The UCC permits a contract to be
Q10: Under the UCC,a firm offer only applies
Q18: Which of the following is an example
Q19: The UCC requires an obligation of good
Q23: What does Section 201 of the UCC
Q25: A(n)_ contract occurs when one party is
Q47: The main issue in CASE 8.1,Option Wireless,Ltd.v.OpenPeak,Inc.(2012),involved
Q49: Under the UCC,the buyer may reject any
Q53: The Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act is