Multiple Choice
Fred sued Document Security Company,alleging he had suffered injuries to his hands as a result of attempting to fix a jam in one of Document Security's paper shredders.Fred alleged the shredder was defective because it failed to contain warnings regarding the dangers to fingers and hands while attempting to fix jams.In order to succeed,Fred will have to show:
A) all risk of harm could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings by Document Security Company.
B) paper shredders are inherently dangerous products.
C) his injuries would not have occurred but for the absence of the warnings.
D) foreseeable risks of harm could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings by Document Security Company.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Most states in the United States have
Q10: CASE 10.2 Branham v.Ford Motor Co.(2010)was reversed
Q27: Which of the following is NOT a
Q31: In regard to successor liability,courts applying the
Q39: If the societal value of an inherently
Q40: In regard to strict liability in tort,which
Q41: CASE 10.3James v.Meow Media,Inc.(2002)addressed whether a video
Q43: Which of the following is true regarding
Q45: Which of the following allows the filing
Q48: Following several injuries,a manufacturer of a chain