Multiple Choice
Fact Pattern 15-1
Gretta is the CEO of a paper company built near a river used in interstate commerce although the state in which the company is located is land locked and not near the coast. Gretta determines that a significant amount of money needs to be spent to comply with the federal Clean Water Act. She is already in trouble with stockholders because of low profits and does not wish to spend extra money on pollution control. Therefore, she instructs employees to simply dump waste into the river. She was aware that she would be fired if the company received a heavy fine, but she decided to take the risk because she was in danger of being fired if profits did not come up anyway. Also, while Gretta believed that the Clean Air Act applied; Linda, a majority stockholder, told her that the Clean Water Act would not apply based upon the location of the plant.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 15-1.Does Gretta have any greater danger in this situation than being fired?
A) Yes, she can be held individually liable for the pollution since she knowingly violated the Clean Water Act; and she could face a fine as well as jail time.
B) Yes, she can be held individually liable for the pollution since she knowingly violated the Clean Water Act; but she could only be fined, not sent to jail.
C) So long as the majority shareholder approves of her actions, she cannot be fined or sent to jail for any environmental violation.
D) No.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A(n)_ is an effect of a purchase
Q2: The principal regulatory program established by the
Q2: A fundamental element of the U.S.scheme of
Q4: Policy statements issued by the EPA have
Q6: Canada withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol.
Q7: Toby is the commissioner of environmental matters
Q11: What does the Superfund Recycling Equity Act
Q22: The Clean Air Act requires that national
Q31: Which of the following is true regarding
Q61: Which of the following laws governs the