Multiple Choice
In CASE 18.2 Kelo v.City of New London (2005) ,the U.S.Supreme Court held that the "takings clause" of the U.S.Constitution's __________ Amendment now means __________ and a city can force private citizens to sell their houses and other property to a __________.
A) First, a regulatory taking, private entity
B) Fifth, public use, public entity only
C) Fifth, economic development, private party
D) Fifth, a regulatory scheme, private party
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Inverse condemnation by the government constitutes a
Q16: Which of the following is NOT one
Q19: A title insurance policy does not insure
Q22: In a(n)_,the potential buyer pays the seller
Q23: A _ gives a person the right
Q27: A variance allows a landowner to construct
Q28: Title companies often hold purchase money in
Q36: A warranty of_ is applied in a
Q45: English common law created a type of
Q62: Which of the following is true regarding