Multiple Choice
In order to establish that a person giving advice owed a duty of care, the plaintiff does not have to prove:
A) the advice caused harm to the person or property of the plaintiff.
B) the advice was of a business or serious nature.
C) the person giving advice knew or should have known that the plaintiff intended to rely on the advice.
D) it was reasonable in the circumstances for the plaintiff to rely on the advice.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: To establish the existence of a duty
Q10: Which of the following elements need not
Q11: The plaintiff can establish that the defendant
Q12: Which of the following scenarios is not
Q13: When a person fails to exercise reasonable
Q15: A person who has carelessly caused harm
Q16: The High Court decided in the decision
Q17: Which of the following principles do the
Q18: An occupier of premises is only liable
Q19: According to the 'eggshell skull' rule:<br>A)if a